Welcome: The Bala Energy Co-operative will benefit the members by developing local renewable energy projects. The members will also enjoy the benefits of being in control of the facility’s development and operational processes; thereby ensuring the social responsibility needs of the members are met.
Memberships available soon!The business of the Co operative will be restricted to:
a. generating, within the meaning of the Electricity Act, 1998, as amended, electricity produced from one or more sources that are renewable energy sources for the purposes of that Act, and
b. selling, as a generator within the meaning of that Act, electricity it produces from one or more renewable energy sources.
As per the Section 1 (1)(d) of the Co-operative Corporations Act, Bala Energy Co-operative will be operated and administered such that any surplus funds will be used to support the welfare of Municipal Ward A in the Township of Muskoka Lakes and the propagation of co-operative principles , after providing for the business of the organization, the needs of its members and ensuring a reasonable amount for the reserve fund.
The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) is considering an application from Swift River Energy Ltd. (SREL) to use Bala Falls for hydroelectric generation. In 2005, under the OLD MNR Site Release policy, the MNR identified that hydro-electric generation may be possible at Bala Falls. They also identified that for various reasons the site may be particularly attractive and therefore issued a request for proposals, rather than accepting applications on a first come first served basis. This process resulted in the MNR offering a small piece of crown land near the North Bala Falls to the only applicant that submitted a proposal (SREL). It is apparent that the MNR site was too small to optimize the resource. In 2008, a request was made for additional land owned by the municipality (who have not issued a request for proposals). Members of the public believe that this request should be rejected by the District of Muskoka because of competing stakeholder values. The Ministry of Environment (MoE) is currently reviewing the SREL submission for completeness. Utlimately the MoE could refuse the approval presented by SREL. Then what? Is the province and the private sector really going to leave the resource alone?
Water is a public resource. Members of the public are quite concerned about the negative impacts of a hydro project at Bala Falls. Yet, the provincial government seems supportive of the idea of a new hydro facility in Bala. There may be a way to harness the resource with minimal negative impacts. All reasonable options (including the NO option) must be thoroughly considered. The application by SREL does not contain a feasibility study of the alternative concept shown in this website. Therefore, in an effort to study the "preferred alternative" to the privatization of Bala Falls, we are pursuing funding options to study the feasibility of a less destructive alternative. If it is determined that a less destructive concept is feasible and does not impair the value of Bala Falls, then the resource may be developed in a socially responsible manner. Failure to develop the south channel may result in private development of Bala Falls and there is a significant risk that the public may not like the result of a private undertaking. The Municipal Land under consideration may be put up for tender if the MoE does not refuse the proposal by SREL. That being the case, we should be ready with a competing proposal and bid. |
The municipality or a renewable energy co-operative could have expressed an interest in the site in 2005. This was not done, mainly because it is a bad idea to use the north site for hydro-electric generation and this is not in the best interest of the public.
We do not need or want to use the north site as it is too important to the community of Bala. Instead we would like to study the south channel. We hope that the District Municipality of Muskoka will withhold permission to use the municipal land until our proposal is considered.
The MNR has stated that it may be risky to construct an intake structure in the South Channel because it is the main spillway for Lake Muskoka. We believe that a Professional Engineer would be able to design an intake structure and construction strategy that would eliminate the risk of impairing flood control. Independent analysis is a must - but it does not come cheap.
We can access grant monies to study the feasibility of a "community friendly" alternative. These funds are needed for an independent analysis of the South Channel alternative.
There are significant reasons to use the south channel as a not-for-profit undertaking instead of using the North Site to enhance the profits of a private company. We need donations and political will to ensure our alternative is thoroughly vetted. Without an independent evaluation of the south channel, we may never know the truth about the feasibility of the South Channel.
There are a variety of opinions regarding using Bala Falls for hydro generation: